Canon olympus相機收購,二手收購,收購相機,全新相機,二手相機 收購5D Mark IV,收購EOS-1D X Mark II,收購EOS M3/M10 收購canon canon 5Ds/5Ds R,,5D Mark III/6D II,7D Mark II 70D/80D,750D/760D,700D/100D 收購FUJIFILM 相機,全系列FUJIFILM 收購二手Nikon 相機,Nikon二手收購,全新Nikong買賣 D3400收購 Nikon 1 j5收購 D750 Df/D810/D610,D5/D4S,D500,D7200/D7500,D5500/D5300
A lawsuit filed against OlympusDAO’s co-founders over $20M+ in the DAO’s native tokens could unmask their identities, testing the limits of pseudonymity in DAOs olympus相機收購
olympus相機收購 t MoverNewsMeme Coin Rally May Signal Impending Altcoin Season; This Is the Sign to WatchNewsMeme Coins DOGE and SHIB Led CoinDesk 20 Gainers Last Week: CoinDesk Indices ChartsNewsGrayscale GBTC Selling Accelerates but Bitcoin ETF Inflows Remain Positive, Led by BlackRockNewsFirst Mover Americas: Is Bitcoin Rallying Ahead of Schedule?FinanceFinanceBinanceSBFFTXCoinbaseBusinessNewsBlackRock’s Spot Bitcoin ETF Starts Trading in BrazilNewsBlast, Hyped Layer-2 Chain, Sees Most Deposits Bridge to Yield Manager NewsRetiring CEO of Giant Asset Manager Vanguard Shunned Bitcoin ETFs. Will His Replacement?NewsBank of America, Wells Fargo to Offer Spot Bitcoin ETFs to Clients: BloombergPolicyPolicySBF Trial CoverageBankruptcySECFTXCFTCNewsWall Street Journal Accused of Defamation Over 2023 Tether-Bitfinex ArticleNewsU.S. Department of Energy Will Start Comment Period on Miner Survey ProposalNewsUK Law Enforcement Will Soon Have More Power to Seize Crypto AssetsNewsIndonesia’s Crypto Watchdog Pushes for Friendlier Taxes as Regulatory Overhaul LoomsTechnologyTechnologyProtocol VillageToken GovernanceDeFiBlockchainsHacksNewsProtocol Village: Renzo, Liquid Restaking Protocol, Expands to Arbitrum in Deal With ConnextNewsStarkWare Unveils New ‘Stwo’ Cryptographic Prover That’s ‘Blazingly Fast’NewsTrading Platform Robinhood, Layer-2 Arbitrum Team Up To Offer Swaps To UsersNewsCoinbase Adds ‘Smart Wallet’ Feature, So Lengthy Seed Phrases Aren’t NeededLearnLearnBitcoin HalvingNFTsBitcoinEthereumCryptocurrencyInvestingLearnWhich Is the Best Self-Custody Lightning Wallet?LearnA Beginner’s Guide to AI TokensLearnWhat Is the ERC-7265 Token Standard?LearnWhat Are Crypto OTC Desks And How Do They Work?Crash CoursesBitcoin 101DeFi 101Ethereum 101NFT 101Price Data 101Consensus MagazineConsensus MagazineMost Influential 2023State of Crypto Week 2023Staking Week 2023Mining Week 2023Crypto Hubs 2023OpinionThe Catch-22 of U.S. Crypto RegulationInterviewWhat’s at the Intersection of Crypto and AI? Perhaps MurderOpinionMt. Gox: What We Still Don’t Know 10 Years After the CollapseOpinionWhy the ENS Battle Over Eth.Link MattersMost Recent IssueProtocol VillageProtocol VillageEthereumLayer 2sOraclesZero-KnowledgeBitcoin CoreNewsProtocol Village: Renzo, Liquid Restaking Protocol, Expands to Arbitrum in Deal With ConnextNewsStarkWare Unveils New ‘Stwo’ Cryptographic Prover That’s ‘Blazingly Fast’NewsTrading Platform Robinhood, Layer-2 Arbitrum Team Up To Offer Swaps To UsersNewsCoinbase Adds ‘Smart Wallet’ Feature, So Lengthy Seed Phrases Aren’t NeededSponsored ContentSponsored ContentMEXCBitgetPhemexNEARGate.USabraMatrixportSocialGoodTronBitcoin$62,461.82+2.13%Ethereum$3,433.62+3.25%Binance Coin$407.63+3.41%Solana$130.90+5.46%XRP$0.60029016+2.66%Cardano$0.69834811+7.94%Dogecoin$0.14033168+20.28%Avalanche$42.56+6.35%Tron$0.14227686+1.76%Chainlink$19.98+5.11%Polkadot$8.67+7.03%Shiba Inu$0.00001664+36.02%Crypto Prices CoinDesk 20 Index CoinDesk 20 Index Financeolympus相機收購olympusDAO Co-Founder Doxxed? Lawsuit Claims to Unmask ‘Apollo’An early olympus相機收購olympus investor alleges he was cheated out of millions of OHM tokens when key smart contracts were rendered inoperable. By Sam KesslerApr 14, 2022 at 7:11 p.m. UTCUpdated May 11, 2023 at 7:15 p.m. UTCShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on X(Metropolitan Museum of Art, modified by CoinDesk)10 Years of Decentralizing the FutureMay 29-31, 2024 – Austin, TexasThe biggest and most established global hub for everything crypto, blockchain and Web3.Register NowShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on XA lawsuit filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for Connecticut alleges that co-founders of the olympus相機收購olympusDAO decentralized finance (DeFi) project cheated an early funder out of nearly 4 million in OHM tokens, which are now worth at least $20 million.In what may be an unprecedented case testing the limits of pseudonymity in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), the lawsuit names a Connecticut resident as the supposed identity behind “Apollo,” one of olympus相機收購olympus’s pseudonymous co-founders.CoinDesk has not independently verified the identity of the alleged Apollo and has reached out to the individual named in the lawsuit, Daniel Bara, for comment.What is olympus相機收購olympusDAO?The Ethereum-based olympus相機收購olympusDAO project has been one of the most talked-about – and most controversial – experiments to enter the world of DeFi in the past year.The project sought to establish its native OHM token as a digital reserve currency through a mix of memes and game theory, but its price famously tanked 95% this past winter.The OHM token now sits at $28 according to CoinMarketCap, down from a $1,300 peak in October.The complainant in the lawsuit filed Thursday, Australia-based investor Jason Liang, says he agreed to promote olympus相機收購olympusDAO and paid $50,000 in DAI (a U.S. dollar-based stablecoin) in a private funding agreement in exchange for 4 million pOHM, a precursor to OHM. According to an olympus相機收購olympus Medium post, investors like Liang were later able to mint 1 OHM in exchange for 1 DAI and 1 pOHM.In his suit, Liang alleges that after he started selling some of his olympus相機收購olympus tokens, the olympus相機收購olympus team punished him by rendering inoperable the smart contracts enabling him to redeem pOHM for OHM.Liang says the olympus相機收購olympus team’s ability to meddle with key smart contract functionality undermines claims that the project is decentralized.According to the lawsuit, the olympus相機收購olympus team also used pseudonymity to protect its members from liability.Liang alleges that a token purchase agreement (TPA) between him and olympus相機收購olympus stated that money raised in the private funding round would go to a company that didn’t actually exist. With the identities of olympus相機收購olympus’s founders a secret, the lack of an officially registered company behind the fundraiser was, according to the lawsuit, designed to make it difficult for an investor like Liang to pursue legal action against the project.The suit says Liang’s legal team identified Apollo by doing a reverse lookup on a phone number Apollo used to call Liang. The name behind the phone number matches one that was signed on the token purchase agreement that Liang originally thought was fictitious.In an email to CoinDesk, Joseph B. Evans, an attorney for Liang, said: “There is a completely legal and legitimate way to run a DAO. This isn’t it. It appears that certain organizations still believe they can avoid liability if their founders and promoters hide behind screen names, social media handles and fictitious entities. My client provided much needed start-up capital to olympus相機收購olympus, and he is entitled to share in its success.”Is olympus相機收購olympusDAO an ‘honest Ponzi’?When olympus相機收購olympusDAO was launched last year, the project’s unique bonding and staking mechanics promised staggeringly high returns to investors in the realm of 10,000% annual percentage yield (APY). In order for the system to work, OHM holders were encouraged to interact with olympus相機收購olympus’s smart contracts according to a set of game theory principles “memefied” by the project’s community.”Hodling,” buying, and staking OHM would theoretically guarantee steady, sky-high returns for the whole community. Selling, like Liang did, was sacrilege.A flock of vocal critics dismissed olympus相機收購olympusDAO as a Ponzi scheme from its very start, but the DAO still managed to spur an entire “DeFi 2.0” movement – inspiring popular spinoffs like KlimaDAO and WonderlandDAO to jump in with their own high-yield token systems.As olympus相機收購olympusDAO has grown into one of the most popular projects in decentralized finance, its creators – the pseudonymous “Zeus” and “Apollo” – have remained anonymous (until now, perhaps, in Apollo’s case).Pseudonymity of a project’s core contributors is not uncommon in the world of DAOs, and it has been framed as a way for a decentralized community to preserve meritocracy.Liang’s lawsuit suggests there are other reasons why DAO creators might want to hide their identities, and the filing comes a couple of months after the pseudonymous creator of WonderlandDAO, olympus相機收購olympusDAO’s largest spinoff, was unmasked as a well-known convicted felon.This is a developing story. Check back for updates.Further reading on pseudonymityWhy CoinDesk Respects Pseudonymity: A Stand Against Doxxi