A lawsuit filed against OlympusDAO’s co-founders over $20M+ in the DAO’s native tokens could unmask their identities, testing the limits of pseudonymity in DAOs olympus相機收購

olympus相機收購
t MoverNewsMeme Coin Rally May Signal Impending Altcoin Season; This Is the Sign to WatchNewsMeme Coins DOGE and SHIB Led CoinDesk 20 Gainers Last Week: CoinDesk Indices ChartsNewsGrayscale GBTC Selling Accelerates but Bitcoin ETF Inflows Remain Positive, Led by BlackRockNewsFirst Mover Americas: Is Bitcoin Rallying Ahead of Schedule?FinanceFinanceBinanceSBFFTXCoinbaseBusinessNewsBlackRock’s Spot Bitcoin ETF Starts Trading in BrazilNewsBlast, Hyped Layer-2 Chain, Sees Most Deposits Bridge to Yield Manager NewsRetiring CEO of Giant Asset Manager Vanguard Shunned Bitcoin ETFs. Will His Replacement?NewsBank of America, Wells Fargo to Offer Spot Bitcoin ETFs to Clients: BloombergPolicyPolicySBF Trial CoverageBankruptcySECFTXCFTCNewsWall Street Journal Accused of Defamation Over 2023 Tether-Bitfinex ArticleNewsU.S. Department of Energy Will Start Comment Period on Miner Survey ProposalNewsUK Law Enforcement Will Soon Have More Power to Seize Crypto AssetsNewsIndonesia’s Crypto Watchdog Pushes for Friendlier Taxes as Regulatory Overhaul LoomsTechnologyTechnologyProtocol VillageToken GovernanceDeFiBlockchainsHacksNewsProtocol Village: Renzo, Liquid Restaking Protocol, Expands to Arbitrum in Deal With ConnextNewsStarkWare Unveils New ‘Stwo’ Cryptographic Prover That’s ‘Blazingly Fast’NewsTrading Platform Robinhood, Layer-2 Arbitrum Team Up To Offer Swaps To UsersNewsCoinbase Adds ‘Smart Wallet’ Feature, So Lengthy Seed Phrases Aren’t NeededLearnLearnBitcoin HalvingNFTsBitcoinEthereumCryptocurrencyInvestingLearnWhich Is the Best Self-Custody Lightning Wallet?LearnA Beginner’s Guide to AI TokensLearnWhat Is the ERC-7265 Token Standard?LearnWhat Are Crypto OTC Desks And How Do They Work?Crash CoursesBitcoin 101DeFi 101Ethereum 101NFT 101Price Data 101Consensus MagazineConsensus MagazineMost Influential 2023State of Crypto Week 2023Staking Week 2023Mining Week 2023Crypto Hubs 2023OpinionThe Catch-22 of U.S. Crypto RegulationInterviewWhat’s at the Intersection of Crypto and AI? Perhaps MurderOpinionMt. Gox: What We Still Don’t Know 10 Years After the CollapseOpinionWhy the ENS Battle Over Eth.Link MattersMost Recent IssueProtocol VillageProtocol VillageEthereumLayer 2sOraclesZero-KnowledgeBitcoin CoreNewsProtocol Village: Renzo, Liquid Restaking Protocol, Expands to Arbitrum in Deal With ConnextNewsStarkWare Unveils New ‘Stwo’ Cryptographic Prover That’s ‘Blazingly Fast’NewsTrading Platform Robinhood, Layer-2 Arbitrum Team Up To Offer Swaps To UsersNewsCoinbase Adds ‘Smart Wallet’ Feature, So Lengthy Seed Phrases Aren’t NeededSponsored ContentSponsored ContentMEXCBitgetPhemexNEARGate.USabraMatrixportSocialGoodTronBitcoin$62,461.82+2.13%Ethereum$3,433.62+3.25%Binance Coin$407.63+3.41%Solana$130.90+5.46%XRP$0.60029016+2.66%Cardano$0.69834811+7.94%Dogecoin$0.14033168+20.28%Avalanche$42.56+6.35%Tron$0.14227686+1.76%Chainlink$19.98+5.11%Polkadot$8.67+7.03%Shiba Inu$0.00001664+36.02%Crypto Prices CoinDesk 20 Index CoinDesk 20 Index Financeolympus相機收購olympusDAO Co-Founder Doxxed? Lawsuit Claims to Unmask ‘Apollo’An early olympus相機收購olympus investor alleges he was cheated out of millions of OHM tokens when key smart contracts were rendered inoperable. By Sam KesslerApr 14, 2022 at 7:11 p.m. UTCUpdated May 11, 2023 at 7:15 p.m. UTCShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on X(Metropolitan Museum of Art, modified by CoinDesk)10 Years of Decentralizing the FutureMay 29-31, 2024 – Austin, TexasThe biggest and most established global hub for everything crypto, blockchain and Web3.Register NowShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on XA lawsuit filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for Connecticut alleges that co-founders of the olympus相機收購olympusDAO decentralized finance (DeFi) project cheated an early funder out of nearly 4 million in OHM tokens, which are now worth at least $20 million.In what may be an unprecedented case testing the limits of pseudonymity in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), the lawsuit names a Connecticut resident as the supposed identity behind “Apollo,” one of olympus相機收購olympus’s pseudonymous co-founders.CoinDesk has not independently verified the identity of the alleged Apollo and has reached out to the individual named in the lawsuit, Daniel Bara, for comment.What is olympus相機收購olympusDAO?The Ethereum-based olympus相機收購olympusDAO project has been one of the most talked-about – and most controversial – experiments to enter the world of DeFi in the past year.The project sought to establish its native OHM token as a digital reserve currency through a mix of memes and game theory, but its price famously tanked 95% this past winter.The OHM token now sits at $28 according to CoinMarketCap, down from a $1,300 peak in October.The complainant in the lawsuit filed Thursday, Australia-based investor Jason Liang, says he agreed to promote olympus相機收購olympusDAO and paid $50,000 in DAI (a U.S. dollar-based stablecoin) in a private funding agreement in exchange for 4 million pOHM, a precursor to OHM. According to an olympus相機收購olympus Medium post, investors like Liang were later able to mint 1 OHM in exchange for 1 DAI and 1 pOHM.In his suit, Liang alleges that after he started selling some of his olympus相機收購olympus tokens, the olympus相機收購olympus team punished him by rendering inoperable the smart contracts enabling him to redeem pOHM for OHM.Liang says the olympus相機收購olympus team’s ability to meddle with key smart contract functionality undermines claims that the project is decentralized.According to the lawsuit, the olympus相機收購olympus team also used pseudonymity to protect its members from liability.Liang alleges that a token purchase agreement (TPA) between him and olympus相機收購olympus stated that money raised in the private funding round would go to a company that didn’t actually exist. With the identities of olympus相機收購olympus’s founders a secret, the lack of an officially registered company behind the fundraiser was, according to the lawsuit, designed to make it difficult for an investor like Liang to pursue legal action against the project.The suit says Liang’s legal team identified Apollo by doing a reverse lookup on a phone number Apollo used to call Liang. The name behind the phone number matches one that was signed on the token purchase agreement that Liang originally thought was fictitious.In an email to CoinDesk, Joseph B. Evans, an attorney for Liang, said: “There is a completely legal and legitimate way to run a DAO. This isn’t it. It appears that certain organizations still believe they can avoid liability if their founders and promoters hide behind screen names, social media handles and fictitious entities. My client provided much needed start-up capital to olympus相機收購olympus, and he is entitled to share in its success.”Is olympus相機收購olympusDAO an ‘honest Ponzi’?When olympus相機收購olympusDAO was launched last year, the project’s unique bonding and staking mechanics promised staggeringly high returns to investors in the realm of 10,000% annual percentage yield (APY). In order for the system to work, OHM holders were encouraged to interact with olympus相機收購olympus’s smart contracts according to a set of game theory principles “memefied” by the project’s community.”Hodling,” buying, and staking OHM would theoretically guarantee steady, sky-high returns for the whole community. Selling, like Liang did, was sacrilege.A flock of vocal critics dismissed olympus相機收購olympusDAO as a Ponzi scheme from its very start, but the DAO still managed to spur an entire “DeFi 2.0” movement – inspiring popular spinoffs like KlimaDAO and WonderlandDAO to jump in with their own high-yield token systems.As olympus相機收購olympusDAO has grown into one of the most popular projects in decentralized finance, its creators – the pseudonymous “Zeus” and “Apollo” – have remained anonymous (until now, perhaps, in Apollo’s case).Pseudonymity of a project’s core contributors is not uncommon in the world of DAOs, and it has been framed as a way for a decentralized community to preserve meritocracy.Liang’s lawsuit suggests there are other reasons why DAO creators might want to hide their identities, and the filing comes a couple of months after the pseudonymous creator of WonderlandDAO, olympus相機收購olympusDAO’s largest spinoff, was unmasked as a well-known convicted felon.This is a developing story. Check back for updates.Further reading on pseudonymityWhy CoinDesk Respects Pseudonymity: A Stand Against Doxxi

olympus相機收購(圖/Nikon)

Nikon 於今日(28)晚間的全球發表會中,揭曉旗下無反機皇 Z9 相機,搭載 4570 萬有效像素層疊式 CMOS 感光元件,還預告未來支援 8K 60p 錄影與全球最快的 120 fps 連拍、20fps RAW 檔連拍。

Z9 使用全新 EXPEED 7 影片處理器,結合全新的演算法,在拍攝時最多能同時追蹤 9 個主體,並有 405 點的自動區域 AF,本次更能捕捉像是高速的短跑運動員、賽車,具備120 fps 連拍 (高速 Frame Capture+3 畫面擷取)、20fps RAW 檔連拍,搭配 CFexpress B 型記憶卡得以瞬間拍下大量畫面。

內建 4570 萬有效像素的層疊式 CMOS,並採用雙重串流技術,有 12 倍的靜態影像讀取速度。觀景窗則是 Quad-VGA 面板,亮度達到 3000cd/m2。機身螢幕則是 Nikon 首款 4 軸垂直與水平掀翻式螢幕,提供多角度的使用,並搭配垂直手把,讓專業人士可以隨時轉換。Nikon 同時提供 i-TTL 均衡補充閃光技術,以臉孔資訊進行閃光控制,可根據人物主體臉龐來操控閃光燈發出的光量,避免相片過度曝光。

錄影規格最高支援 8K 30p,且能錄製最多 125 分鐘不會過熱,4K 則能最多拍攝 120fps 的慢動作,且能使用 H.265 (HEVC) 和 Apple ProRes 422 HQ 等不同的解碼方式。Nikon 更預告,Z9 將會透過韌體更新提供 8K 60p、12-bit RAW 影片攝錄及其他功能。

Z9 是 Nikon 首款無機械快門無反單眼,省略機械快門,以快速掃描拍攝將滾動快門變形減至最低,相機的內建減震 (VR) 系統採用了安全鎖,防止影像感測器受損。

Nikon Z9 售價是 5500 美元(約 15.2 萬),台灣上市資訊尚未公布。

olympus相機收購 olympus相機收購

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *